Cabling
and Bracing
A
recently approved American National Standard for Tree Care Operations
identifies the methods and materials arborists should use when
installing tree support systems.
by Michael Oswald
American
National Standards Institute (ANSI) A300 (Part 3)-2000 presents
performance standards for the care and maintenance of trees, shrubs,
and other woody plants, and is a supplement to ANSI A300-1995.
ANSI A300 (Part 3)-2000 should be used in conjunction with the
rest of the A300 standard when writing specifications for tree
care operations.
The new standard is
intended as a guide in the drafting of maintenance specifications
for federal, state, municipal, and private authorities including
property owners, property managers and utilities.
The A300 standard stipulates
that specifications for tree work should be written and administered
by a professional possessing the technical competence to provide
for, or supervise, the management of woody landscape plants. Users
of this standard must first interpret its meaning, then apply
their knowledge of the growth habits of certain plant species
in a given environment. In this way, the user ultimately develops
their own specifications for plant maintenance.
Support
Systems
The new standard states
that support systems are used to provide supplemental support
to leaders, individual limbs, and/or the whole plant, and that
the objectives for support systems should be clearly defined prior
to installation.
"When writing the new
standard," states Craig Greco, candidate for Masters of Forest
Resources at Clemson University, "people were asking if what we
have been doing in past decades really works. Is this or that
step really necessary? Is it the best way? Can we improve on these
methods? New technologies such as computer simulations can help
today's arborists look at trees from an engineering perspective,
and the standard will improve as more research is conducted."
Ron Rubin, operating
officer at The Care of Trees, says the new ANSI standard raises
some additional questions, which can be answered with more research.
"For example," he notes, "we left enough room to add the Cobra
system--a harness-type system consisting of polyurethane rope,
rather than cables and bolts. There hasn't been a tremendous amount
of research on cabling hardware, and systems will become morecomprehensive
as they evolve."
"The standard is very
worthwhile, in that it gives the industry some guidelines from
which to work," Rubin says. "It includes some basic practices
we all strive for."
According to Dr. Tom
Smiley, researcher at Bartlett Tree Research Laboratory, the International
Society of Arboriculture will be coming out with a series of books
entitled Best Arboricultural Practices. "One of the books in that
series will cover this new tree support systems standard," he
says.
Pruning
According to the new
standard, all necessary pruning should be performed prior to installing
a tree support system. "This step is important," Rubin explains,
"because you want to get all the weight off before installing
the cable. Pruning first, allows the worker to make the cable
properly taut. You also want to make sure that, after you do the
pruning, it's still appropriate to put the cable in."
Liability
Prior to installation,
according to the new standard, the owner or owner's agent should
be notified of the need for periodic inspection by an arborist.
The standard goes on to say that inspections should be the responsibility
of the tree owner and should include system, condition, position,
cable tension, and the tree's structural integrity.
"Putting a cable in
doesn't exonerate the property owner, or the arborist for that
matter, of any liability," Rubin notes. "It merely indicates that
a structural flaw has been identified. And it's the property owner's
or manager's responsibility to have the support system inspected
periodically. If potential liability is of the utmost importance,
the best option may be to remove the limb or tree."
Greco furthers this
point. "Many people want to get the hazard out of the way," he
relates. "But arborists need to make it clear to the property
owner that installing a tree support system isn't a concrete method
for stabilizing the tree. It's merely preventative."
How frequently these
periodic inspections should be conducted depends on several factors,
according to Greco. "The tree species, its environment and the
age of the tree all affect how often the support system should
be inspected," he says. "For instance, a
Silver Maple might need more frequent inspection than a Willow
Oak."
Hardware
Steel hardware should
be corrosion resistant, and synthetic fiber cable systems should
be ultra-violet (UV) light resistant, according to the standard.
"Sunlight breaks down the plastics in synthetic fibers if the
cable's not UV resistant," Greco says. "Likewise, plain steel
cabling shouldn't be used. Zinc-plated, or galvanized, steel cable
has a defense against corrosion. These cables cost more, but the
extra money is well worth it."
Cavities, the standard
indicates, should not be filled to provide support. "Filler material
is only cosmetic," Greco says. "It's not a good material for strengthening."
Installation
According to the new
standard, the diameter of the hole shall not be greater than one-sixth
(1/6) the diameter of the limb, trunk, or branch at the point
of installation, and the longitudinal alignment of anchors and/or
braces should be avoided.
Dr. Tom Smiley says
the one-sixth guideline is intended to prevent very large hardware
from being installed in small trees. "Also, anchors and braces
shouldn't be placed one underneath the other," he adds. "By offsetting
them, you won't split the bark between them."
Heavy-duty or heat-treated
heavy duty round steel washers, the standard states, should be
installed between the nut(s) and the wood. "In tests," Smiley
reports, "we've found that standard-duty washers can bend and
pull right through the hole in the bolt. It's better to use heat-treated,
heavy-duty washers, which tend to be thicker and larger in diameter.
The washer is important because it spreads out the force of the
pull on the bolt."
Holes for through-hardware
should not be drilled greater than 1/8" (3 mm) of the diameter
of the hardware being installed, states the standard. "Through
hardware should slip easily into the hole you drill," Smiley explains.
"From a tree health perspective, you'd like to drill the hole
the same size as the hardware when you can. In some cases, however,
you need to drill the hole a slightly larger diameter than the
hardware. This is especially true of pines, which tend to close
down after you drill the hole. All the standard is saying is that
an arborist may need to drill the hole 1/8-inch larger in diameter,
at most, than the diameter of the hardware."
Terminations formed
by eye-splice configurations should incorporate thimbles, according
to the standard. "The heavy-duty thimble is a piece of metal that
prevents the cable from wearing," Smiley states. "Cables tend
to wear where the I-bolt and the cable touch, and use of a thimble
can keep the cable from wearing in that spot."
Installations, the
standard indicates, shall follow manufacturers' recommendations.
"The dead-end grip and Cobra systems are the only types we know
of that come with instructions," Smiley states. "This portion
of the standard simply points out that if a tree support system
comes with instructions, those instructions should be followed
by the installer."
Cabling
The standard says that
cabling systems should be designed using one or more of the cabling
system types in Figure 39.2. "The cabling system type used is
totally dependent on the situation of the specific tree you're
working on," says Rubin. "The box and triangle methods distribute
the weight very well. Although hub and spoke is a good method,
few people I've spoken to use that method, due to the cost in
time and materials."
|